Gee. You're being **** retentive over the title? You gotta **** or get off the pot. I'm amazed at the illogic behind your conclusions. I know now that you can't understand what I'm talking about because it takes a level of reasoning that you don't possess. It must be in your Polack genes, so I can't hold it against you. I won't. You can't see the forest if too many trees are in it. You're too easily distracted to fully follow what's happening, so please don't try.

Go drive your toilet bus and be happy. I won't burden you with having to juggle two or more thoughts any longer.

 

Yep, he's a terribly confused Polack puppy for sure. He just licks his *** like my dog does when the world gets to be too much for the moment.

 

Are you talking about sense, like contradicting Associate Press, that they are writing about chronological earthquakes, when in fact they titled their article "Major World Earthquakes " ?
My dog would be smarter, than that.

 

Good God. You are seriously damaged goods. Don't blame yourself, though. It's not your fault that your parents had sex and didn't use birth control.

 

Case in point...

 

His **** retentiveness is exceeded only by his propensity to produce poop.

 

I still don't think he's serious -- no one could be that dumb and operate a computer.

 

You're right! It can't possibly be both! It turns out that major is actually the opposite of chronological.


ma·jor ( P ) Pronunciation Key (mjr)
adj.

Having no specific pattern, purpose, or objective: major movements.
Mathematics & Statistics. Of or relating to a type of circumstance or event that is described by a probability distribution.
Of or relating to an event in which all outcomes are equally likely, as in the testing of a blood sample for the presence of a substance.

 

Just think of the extreme pain and confusion the Polack would be suffering if the AP writer had had his **** together and titled his piece Major World Earthquakes in Chronological Order.

How about Major World Earthquakes in Chronological Order Along With the Number of People Killed?

In order to be a proper title according to Polack logic, it should have been titled Major World Earthquakes in Chronological Order Along With the Number of People Killed, Listed One Per Line Using Double Spacing and Using Periods, Commas, and Other Punctuation Where Appropriate.

 

So Lugnut let's see how did you do in this topic.
You linked, what you suggested is statistic of Major Earthquakes. In the very first reply I questioned why the list of major earthquakes doesn't include (some) major earthquakes.
You made 13 replies after that. Did you answer the simple question? Let's see:

Nope, that still suppose cover California earthquakes

Nope. California earthquakes would fit here as well.

I am afraid you went a bit past your education level.

So.... Lugnut. What schools did you attend, that didn't teach you how to answer basic question in 13 replies?
Have you ever had your IQ tested?