Off Topic A place to boldly go off topic. just about anything goes here. Keep it clean.

Rehnquist

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-06-2005, 12:07 PM
BikerDrew's Avatar
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,073
Default Rehnquist

Why do our justices wait until death to leave their jobs? He should have left the post with some dignity, passing the torch with some advise and consent.
 
  #2  
Old 09-06-2005, 01:17 PM
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 3,766
Default RE: Rehnquist

Tradition. Tradition borne from judges being appointed for life. That's where the mistake is being made. Only dictators should be appointed for life.

So, what's up with Sandra Day O'Connor? She's not a traditionalist, I suppose.
 
  #3  
Old 09-06-2005, 01:48 PM
GermanStar's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fountain Hills, AZ
Posts: 457
Default RE: Rehnquist

It also seems to be tradition to appoint a new chief justice rather than select one from the current crew. That strikes me as rather odd. Any theories behind the reasoning?
 
  #4  
Old 09-06-2005, 03:34 PM
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 3,766
Default RE: Rehnquist

An appointment is a way for the sitting president to leave a legacy. He doesn't want to elevate, so to speak, a justice appointed by a different president. He wants to make his own appointment.
 
  #5  
Old 09-06-2005, 05:54 PM
GermanStar's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fountain Hills, AZ
Posts: 457
Default RE: Rehnquist

That's kinda what I figured. How sad that it boils down to ego and arrogance. I would be prone to promote one with prior Supreme experience, myself (unless none met with my approval, of course). From what I understand, that is almost unheard of.
 
  #6  
Old 09-06-2005, 06:26 PM
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 3,766
Default RE: Rehnquist

Appointments can backfire, too. Take David Souter for example. He was appointed by papa Bush as a conservative. He pretty much takes a moderate path and adheres to the rule of law. That's gotta **** off all the Bushes.

He really cranked it to the conservatives when he recently supported the ruling expanding local governments' powers over eminent domain. That pisses off most people, except for big developers and anyone who gets to spend local taxes.
 
  #7  
Old 09-06-2005, 06:34 PM
GermanStar's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fountain Hills, AZ
Posts: 457
Default RE: Rehnquist

I think that one pissed just about everybody off. God help us all -- we don't already have enough friggin' mini-malls...
 
  #8  
Old 09-07-2005, 12:25 AM
BikerDrew's Avatar
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,073
Default RE: Rehnquist

I've been in court. Judges act like dictators. They only answer to a jury or other judges. Fortunantly, they must obey the law.
 
  #9  
Old 09-07-2005, 02:26 AM
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 3,766
Default RE: Rehnquist

Well, I honestly don't know how else you could run a court. Especially a criminal court.

Don't all people in charge act like dictators? Some are nicer dictators than others, but when push comes to shove, it's their way or the highway.
 
  #10  
Old 09-07-2005, 12:42 PM
BikerDrew's Avatar
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,073
Default RE: Rehnquist

You are right. A dictatorship is more efficient and can move more swiftly than any group think system. You have to be VERY careful selecting one though...

Just think, the president gets to select a nice dictator and live with the results for life. A bunch of lawyers designed our country and THEY get to be dictators, er... judges. Congress restricts power through legislation (rules). Too bad the trend has been to create law IN the courts.

To quote Michael Savage "The stench from the bench is making makes me clench."
 




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:24 AM.